Skip to content
SHEDIAC · PATHWAY COMPARISON

Compare a staffed company expansion with a personally directed enterprise

USAvisa field guide · 2 minute readReviewed 7 September 2026

Read the general pathway comparison overview

THE SHORT ANSWER

A Shediac applicant may consider a transfer into a new affiliate or investment in a business combining sales and repair. Both proposals need realistic staffing, but their employment, ownership and funding conditions differ.

01

Test the transfer relationship

L-1 depends on a qualifying group relationship and foreign employment, plus the actual managerial/executive or specialized-knowledge role. A recruitment plan should not be treated as an established workforce or as a substitute for the other conditions.

02

Test the investor arrangement

E-2 requires treaty nationality, at least 50% relevant national enterprise ownership, development and direction, substantial at-risk capital with lawful source and path, and a real nonmarginal business. Two revenue streams do not automatically establish economic capacity.

03

Compare actual responsibilities and obligations

Identify who performs the underlying work, who directs the enterprise and who bears financial risk. Keep permissions tied to the actual arrangement. An authorization for one proposal is not blanket approval to work in the other.

SOURCE NOTES

Editorial source review: 2026-09-07. General preparation guidance, not an individual assessment.

A CONVERSATION IS A GOOD PLACE TO START.

WHAT’S YOUR
NEXT CHAPTER?

Tell us where you are today.
Let’s talk about where you want to go.

Book a free consultation Or call +1 506 805 1144