Read the general pathway comparison overview
Suppose a Dieppe applicant could manage a function within an employer group or own an online venture using outside fulfillment. Both may involve contractors, but their immigration requirements depend on the different employment and ownership arrangements.
For the transfer, examine the organization and role
L-1 requires the qualifying group relationship and foreign employment history. L-1A concerns primarily managerial or executive work; L-1B concerns qualifying specialized knowledge. Outsourced support must be explained in relation to the actual duties rather than used as a generic qualification claim.
For the venture, examine nationality and capital
E-2 requires relevant treaty nationality, including at least 50% enterprise ownership by treaty-country nationals, development and direction, substantial at-risk funds with lawful source and path, and a real nonmarginal business. An account with a fulfillment provider proves neither capital eligibility nor economic capacity.
Compare who directs the proposed work
Write down authority, financial exposure and responsibilities under each proposal. Permission tied to one arrangement is not unrestricted authority to work in another business. Reassess the comparison when ownership, supervision or the proposed enterprise changes.
What else is on your mind?
Does being a business owner or director qualify me for L-1A?What employment history should an L-1 transfer review cover?What makes a new-office L-1A case different?How should an owner compare L-1 and E-2?Editorial source review: 2026-09-07. General preparation guidance, not an individual assessment.