The evidence must accurately explain both contributions. A combined statement cannot replace the necessary source and transfer history for each.
Separate the claims that need proof
Record who generated which funds and how they reached the investment. If the underlying events differ, preserve that difference rather than applying one donor’s explanation to the other.
Years of earnings records, tax filings, business sale agreements, loan documents and transfer confirmations may be needed to trace the funds, and a job-creation methodology has to hold up on review. Lawful obtaining is examined through the donor: the file must show how the parents came to have the money, which for a farm sale means the deed, the title history, the quota records and the tax returns around the disposition. A thoroughly documented personal funding history does not substitute for the project's own job-creation evidence, and an impressive project presentation does not substitute for the investor's lawful-capital documentation. Inheritance is a recognized source, but the requirement is proof of how the capital was obtained, which means showing both how the deceased acquired it and how the estate transferred it to the beneficiary. Ask how the remaining funding affects the proposed activity and qualifying-job evidence, and whether the investor’s petition would accurately describe the project’s current position.